9/11 Investigation - Conspiracy?

I don't think I've commented much about 9/11 myself, if at all. I've left it mostly for others since I have no concrete evidence or proof if anyone should ask. I've been reading some pretty good commentary on this lately though, not necessarily in the mainstream news, but on the internet. It would take more than one website at least to even attempt to cover it all, far too much to say here. But from what I've read, there are some seemingly plausible conspiracy theories that abound, speculating that it is possible that there were actually no accidental intelligence failures leading to the attacks on September 11th. Instead of incompetence, it is suggested that it was with foreknowledge, with complicity, enabling the terrorist's own plot, and then using the tragedy for political ends. Those plans to destroy the World Trade towers could have been facilitated and then even co-opted by some unscrupulous high command (possibly not even elected to office in our government) in order to create an atmosphere conducive to their plans for war, world conquest, and total control of the masses of humanity. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were just the beginnings of that plan for global domination - pick on the weakest parts first.

That is one theory then, that those in power not only wanted the attacks to happen, but they helped it along the way and made it happen. Was 9/11 a black covert operation by the CIA and others to hijack the hijackers and bring the twin towers down in order to prepare the way for an endless war in Asia and the Middle East to secure the valuable region for the oil industry? You can recall that this plan for "a new Pearl Harbor" and war for oil and global dominance was put forward some years ago by the leaders who are now in office, members of the PNAC who call for a new American empire.

The theory then is that the al-Qaeda threat wasn't totally neglected, but was perceived and even nurtured, used for the purposes of the military-industrial complex and Big Oil for a plan that had been standing by for years waiting for final implementation by Big Money. And so far the plans have been evolving somewhat along the order of the original plot which they have stated. And, these conflicts were designed and created toward the end of profiting from war and that the Illuminati should control everyone and everything on earth. Quite a conspiracy theory, eh? If it's true, then it is very worrisome indeed, is it not? It would also mean that we are in very serious danger from our own leaders. For what could they have in store for us next?

Have I driven home this point enough, that they do have the ability to do this in America? I doubt though somehow that their ambitions to rule the whole world can be fulfilled without nearly total destruction. But anyway, here are some other accusations of this theory:

* The planes could have been operated and flown by remote control into the twin towers. It is even possible that two sets of planes were used in the strategy and the ones that hit the tower were substitute planes.

* Flight 93 was probably shot down over Pennsylvania.

* It is more likely that a missile or a military jet struck the Pentagon than a jetliner.

* The World Trade Towers were demolished by explosives, which had been implanted in the buildings before the hijackings, and made sure the buildings would fall while the firefighters were called to action and the people in the towers sought to escape.

* The Air Force was ordered to not follow normal standard operating procedure and mandatory protocol but to "stand down" at the time of the hijackings.

Our Commander-in-Chief says, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty."

And pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, you might see what you don't want to see. But then, maybe it's something we should all think about some more.

Ephan Butz says "peace". Is he kidding or just being contrary?

There are some who might deride him and call him crazy, but if both the sides of conflict profit from the power of the violence of terror could it not then be in the same coin? And if slaughter is their business, why then would war ever stop? If war didn't make some people rich, would it still continue? That's not that big an if'n. The 'magic 8-ball says "all signs point to yes",' but hopefully maybe just for a short time.
Vote for Ephan Butz! :) Er, what? No *peace* candidate? No Ephans or Butz?